… but is anyone doing grad admissions right now? We have 16% female applicants – this is lower than I would’ve expected, but I don’t have data from past years.
Advertisements
-
Recent Posts
Contributors
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
Categories
Meta
beckocopenhaver
Chloe Armstrong
Chris Meyns
Colin Heydt
Eugene Marshall
LisaShapiro
Joshua M. Wood
Julia Jorati
juliekrwalsh
Kenny Pearce
Lewis Powell
Antonia LoLordo
Colin McLear
modsquadguest
marcy p lascano
sethbordner
Stewart Duncan
Sydney Penner
Timothy Yenter
Jessica Gordon-Roth
Kirsten Walsh
Advertisements
Just a random though, and I wouldn’t expect anyone to be collecting _this_ data, but I do wonder whether women tend to be a higher proportion of the _serious_ applicants, in most people’s applicant pools? Or, to put it the other way around: if one looks at the chunk of one’s applications that one can pretty quickly eliminate from closer consideration, is it overwhelmingly a matter of way-overconfident-in-their-philosophical-ability guys? This wouldn’t surprise me if it turned out to be so, and if it did, then this higher proportion of at-least-potentially-qualified female applicants would be the more appropriate one to consider when judging things like whether or not female applicants are being admitted at a proportionate rate.
I am not on the committee this year, but last year 6% of our applications were from women (our faculty is 35% women fwiw). My limited experience doesn’t support JW’s hypothesis about the relative quality of applications from women.
My experience doesn’t really support Jonathan’s hypothesis either – although maybe we have different conceptions of seriousness – I don’t think there are enough non-serious applicants to change the stats all that much.
I’m sure most major Universities collect such data and have for years–by gender, citizenship, race/ethnicity and broken down by every program or department. They have to submit it to Peterson’s, the Council of Grad Schools, US News & World Reports, every accreditation agency, every big federal grant. Call up the Dean of the Graduate School and ask if it’s published in a fact book or how to get the data. It’s public information, at least for public institutions.
Bringing this thread into Mod-land: I wonder whether people could comment on how many applicants characterize themselves as primarily interested in early modern phil? In my many years of tracking admissions at UCLA, UCI, and UNC, I’d say the average is about two per year. There were also two or three per year focused on Kant’s theoretical phil (and sometimes a bunch on Kant’s ethics)
Alan – two a year for early modern sounds right – so does two or three for Kant, even though we don’t have any faculty who work on Kant. Probably 5-10 for ancient.
[…] both US and UK, about a recent (last few years) drop in women applying to do PhDs in philosophy. This blog post is attempting to collect data on the […]
My UK department had a 50-50 PhD student ratio for years. The last two years our female applicant percentage plummeted, reaching 10% last year.
When I was applying to graduate school, I found this data from the University of Minnesota: http://www.grad.umn.edu/data/stats/ad/1065200.html
I wish every school kept that kind of data and made it public!
UNC also publishes such data: http://gradschool.unc.edu/admissions/stats.html
Here is a breakdown of the male/female admission statistics for UNC 2003-2010:
In 2003 135 males applied 58 females (30%)
In 2004 158 males applied 62 females (28%)
In 2005 194 males applied 62 females (24%)
In 2006 180 males applied 52 females (22%)
In 2007 211 males applied 56 females (21%)
In 2008 171 males applied 44 females (20%)
In 2009 197 males applied 62 females (24%)
In 2010 216 males applied 52 females (19%)
I wonder if this is entirely a function of the economic slow down, or if the greater attention being paid to the treatment of women in our profession may be having an impact on how undergrads consider their options (i.e. the creation of the “What It’s Like…” blog and other articles around the blogosphere).